On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:22:04AM -0800, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 01:03:03PM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:51:46PM -0500, John J. McDonough wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karsten 'quaid' Wade" > > >> Is there a reason to archive the beats-per-release? > > > > > > For a new beat writer, being able to view the previous release's beats > > > would be a big win. Even for someone who wrote the previous release > > > notes, reviewing what happened six months ago could be handy. > > > > No doubt the Archive: pages would be easier than going through page > > histories. No problem here if we want to move using a hierarchy of > > some kind, I just didn't want to ignore page naming guidelines. On > > the other hand, Archive: isn't searched by default so renaming may be > > irrelevant. > > That was why we thought not to bother renaming to Archive; esp. since > archiving is usually just per page rather than tracking a history. > > In this case, if having the full history per release is useful to > writers, then it does make sense to rename following a common scheme: > > Docs/Beats/Devel for F10 => Archive:Devel_beat_F10 > or => Archive:Relnotes-Devel_beat_F10 > > Not sure ... since 'beat' is used by >1 group now (as it should!), do > we want to start identifying the release notes beats separately? Yes, but I would use full words to improve search results, since "relnotes" is a jargon thing. "Archive:F10_Release_notes_Devel_beat" Note all underscores, since I'm pretty sure that hyphens have a deleterious effect on searching. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
pgpgKpPIfY8bz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
