On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 01:03:03PM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:51:46PM -0500, John J. McDonough wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karsten 'quaid' Wade" > > > >> Is there a reason to archive the beats-per-release? > > > > For a new beat writer, being able to view the previous release's beats > > would be a big win. Even for someone who wrote the previous release > > notes, reviewing what happened six months ago could be handy. > > No doubt the Archive: pages would be easier than going through page > histories. No problem here if we want to move using a hierarchy of > some kind, I just didn't want to ignore page naming guidelines. On > the other hand, Archive: isn't searched by default so renaming may be > irrelevant. That was why we thought not to bother renaming to Archive; esp. since archiving is usually just per page rather than tracking a history. In this case, if having the full history per release is useful to writers, then it does make sense to rename following a common scheme: Docs/Beats/Devel for F10 => Archive:Devel_beat_F10 or => Archive:Relnotes-Devel_beat_F10 Not sure ... since 'beat' is used by >1 group now (as it should!), do we want to start identifying the release notes beats separately? - Karsten, who can turn any simple task hard -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener http://quaid.fedorapeople.org AD0E0C41
Attachment:
pgpIREbdYLcSq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
