On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 13:21 +0000, Paul W. Frields wrote: > But we *REALLY* need to pow-wow about ongoing L10n difficulties -- see > Noriko's very helpful messages to f-trans-list and f-docs-list -- and > how to solve them properly: > > 1. How do we make fedora-doc-utils available for people to commit? > Should we backport changes from that repo to the old CVS/docs-common, > and let translators continue to use that? Since we have the 'cvsl10n' group already well populated, that is a good way to go. Is anyone available today to port the changes from the fedora-doc-utils git repo back to the CVS module? > 2. Do the influx of translators from Red Hat's translation community > (hopefully many more languages) have the ability to effectively add > support for their respective languages in our new modules? There are now two aspects: 1. Updates to docs-common 2. New languages in LINGUAS For the first, what about opening up docs-common to cvsl10n so people can just check in the files they need to? For the second, the only thing I can think of is to send a request for each language, and a git committer can make the change. > 3. We need to update the TQSG with the appropriate guidance for > translators. OK, once we know what that is. > There may be other issues -- I haven't triaged all my email yet this > morning. I'm not seeing anything else. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Community Gardener Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
