On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 15:10 -0700, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 09:49 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > Do you think it would be worthwhile to rename as follows? > > > > Makefile --> Makefile.publican > > Makefile.old --> Makefile > > > > That would make the procedures correspond better with the current TQSG > > and maybe be less confusing. I could add another Makefile rule that > > gives a detailed response if there's no "docs-common" found. > > +1 > > Best might be a way to call either toolchain from a make command option, > with one Makefile wrapping Makefile.publican or > Makefile.fedora-docs-utils. But maybe we don't need that logic for > long? Yeah, it's probably more trouble than it's worth. -- Paul W. Frields gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://paul.frields.org/ - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
