Kevin Kofler said the following on 09/18/2008 11:28 AM Pacific Time:
John Poelstra <poelstra <at> redhat.com> writes:
Did you have any comments on the tasks prior to Beta? I'd like to get
those right too so that building F11 is on auto-pilot :)
Coming from a developer / beat writer standpoint here: One thing which should
be clearer is when exactly the beats stop targeting Fn release note errata and
start targeting Fn+1 (currently n=9). Because we want to make sure our changes
for Fn+1 end up in the Fn+1 release notes, but we don't want them in the Fn
release note errata! And if the point where we're targeting F10 already
happened, then can the wiki please be fixed not to refer to F9 all over the
Docs/Beats front page? This is something I already complained about in the F9
cycle.
I'm all ears. If someone can provide the new dates and idea behind them
(what they are based on) I can add them.
One of these views might provide helpful perspective.
http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-10/f-10-docs-tasks.html
http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-10/f-10-releng-tasks.html
John
--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
