On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 01:22:47PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > Currently the page > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Help:Wiki_Structure#Page_naming has two > different naming conventions, one for end-user docs, and one for > non-end-user docs. > The above says that single level nesting is ok for non-end-user > sub-projects. ie, we could have > /Ambassadors/Requirements_for_NA_Ambassadors (old style would have > been /Ambassadors/NA/Requirements). And that end user docs is more > akin to the RFC suggested style. The RFC iirc, says that page naming > should be more akin to "A__Docs_Project_page_named_something_better" > and abandon the /DocsProject/Pages/Better/Named/Because/Nested/A > model. > > I saw a couple of messages as follow up (that focused on a specific > page) but no real discussion of the merit of the RFC or lack thereof > of page naming in general. Anyone care to wade into this discussion or > will the RFC be implemented by fiat? > I am purposefully trying to stir the pot a bit, as I recently asked > for clarification and was told that there currently isn't a standard > set - and that low list activity == poor decision making? :) > I believe the page needs updated, because I think we agreed on a hard "no subpages" rule. I don't remember that well though, I'll have to go check logs. -- Ian Weller <ianweller@xxxxxxxxx> http://ianweller.org GnuPG fingerprint: E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226 B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36 "Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet." ~ Douglas Adams
Attachment:
pgpCLylXRcGRd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
