On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:22 AM, David Nalley <david.nalley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Currently the page > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Help:Wiki_Structure#Page_naming has two > different naming conventions, one for end-user docs, and one for > non-end-user docs. > The above says that single level nesting is ok for non-end-user > sub-projects. ie, we could have > /Ambassadors/Requirements_for_NA_Ambassadors (old style would have > been /Ambassadors/NA/Requirements). And that end user docs is more > akin to the RFC suggested style. The RFC iirc, says that page naming > should be more akin to "A__Docs_Project_page_named_something_better" > and abandon the /DocsProject/Pages/Better/Named/Because/Nested/A > model. As I understand it that is the model being discussed right now by the Docs project. I chatted with Ian Weller about this, but they've not yet confirmed they are going this way quite yet. Cheers, Clint -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
