Re: Bullet-proof method of asking upstream for clarification?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 13:43 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 07:24 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 02:21:56PM +0900, Jared Smith wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 09:20 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > > > It would be nice if some non-English speakers on this list would look at
> > > > it.  Then post to the list here to tell me if any of the text rubs you
> > > > the wrong way! :-)
> > > 
> > > Well, I wouldn't go so far as to call myself a non-English speaker, but
> > > it might be good to include a link to Fedora's licensing policy, so that
> > > if nothing else, this can be an educational experience for the person
> > > receiving an email such as this.
> > 
> > Your wish is my command -- so added! ;-)
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pfrields/DraftUpstreamRequestEmail
> 
> I'm obviously a bad person to comment on, since my messages often go
> through as "undiplomatic", but can you add a line about adding a
> detached text license file in the same archive as the font files?

Added a bullet for this, thanks!

-- 
Paul W. Frields
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://paul.frields.org/   -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux