Timothy Murphy wrote: > On Friday 21 December 2007 07:02:09 pm Mike McGrath wrote: > >> Karl listen, I've been nice by not saying anything but now I'm going >> to. Over 1500 people have completed the very process that you're >> complaining about. Even in the time you've tried to apply people have >> succeeded. Its not an easy process but it does take a level of >> competence and independance to complete (we're working on making it >> better, really) I'm not making fun, but your jabs and quips aren't >> helping anyone. The docs mailing list is not the place for technical >> support for signing the CLA and the fedora-list is not a blog. > > Since you have put the boot in ... > I take it the aim of the Fedora Documentation Project > is to produce documentation that makes it easier to use Fedora. Indeed. > If the documentors cannot produce documentation > that makes it easy to use their own system, How so? As Mike pointed out already, there are over 1500 people who managed to accomplish this, following the procedure from those pages. Regardless of the fact that the accounts system needs revision due to its complexity, procedure seems to be clear for a large number of people. > can we have confidence that they will do better with Fedora? > I don't know. Can you? > > This is becoming a bit silly. Can we finally wrap-up? Vladimir
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
