On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 08:21 +0200, Bart Couvreur wrote: > Op zondag 21-10-2007 om 17:30 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Karsten > Wade: > > On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 16:50 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > I completely forgot my other AOB for the Docs meeting this morning, > > > sorry... I am contemplating doing away with the completion requirements > > > (>90%) for all release notes components, for several reasons: > > > > I was going to bring this up this morning, but it felt like heresy for > > some reason. An obvious sign to do away with something if it feels > > heretical to think about it! > > > > Yeah, let's just include what is there and roll updates. :) > > > > - Karsten > > Seems to be an easy one here, so a +1 too. > > As a result of this, will we be doing say monthly updates to the > relnotes package, so this propagates to the user systems, or would we > call that overkill? I am leery about committing to monthly updates, but let's just say we're committed to doing updates, period. If and when it feels worthwhile, we'll do it. Remember that an update -- since fedora-release-notes appears on almost every system -- means you're forcing every single Fedora user (well, almost every user) to download 3 MB of an update. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
