On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 10:50 +0300, John Babich wrote: > On 6/8/07, Jonathan Roberts <jonathan.roberts.uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 07/06/07, Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 09:33 +0100, Jonathan Roberts wrote: > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > I don't know but I'm guessing this was prompted by the Revisor doc? > > > > > > > <snip> > > You may already know this, but I had occasion to chat recently with daMaestro > of Fedora Unity, who also is a contributor to the Fedora Project. > > See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JohnBabich/RevisorChat for details. > > Basically, all docs on both the fedoraproject.org and fedoraunity.org sites > are under the Open Publication License (OPL), so that there's no problem > freely borrowing material from revisor.fedoraunity.org. +1 Our friends in Fedora Unity did that on purpose. :) If there is enough content that you wonder if you have to fork it, let's get together with the Revisor folks and work out where they want their canonical documentation to live, and can we contribute to the SRPM with content for /usr/share/doc/revisor-*. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
