Re: DUG Review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 10:50 +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Timothy Murphy [21/03/2007 10:25]:
> >
> > As I said before, if the authors assume the reader is running Gnome
> > then it would be more honest to call the document the "Gnome Users Manual".
> 
> The manual spends a substantial amount of time on Firefox and OpenOffice
> so I really wouldn't call it a Gnome user's manual. This would just mislead
> people.
> 
> Adding a paragraph to the introduction about the fact that the guide
> describes the default Desktop and that contributors wanting to write
> about non-default installations will be welcomed with open arms would
> be nice, though.

The first part of your suggestion is already there -- but the second
part would be good to add, I agree.  It is a wiki, please contribute
your ideas in the form of an edit!  :-)

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
      Fedora Project:  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PaulWFrields
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux