On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 07:14 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: > On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 10:35 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > > > Perhaps we should shoot for 1700 UTC since that is the other block that > > looks most open on our draft schedule: > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BobJensen/MeetingTimes > > OK. I put time my times before the time change, so I'll have to review > that the chart is still accurate for me. > > In general 1700 is a little late in the morning for me, but I'll make do > today. Should we adjust the chart to the new DST? I suppose that could be as easy as rearranging the left-most "time" cells and scooting one row to the other end of the table. If so, all my times will apply again (i.e. before 5:00 p.m. is always bad for me whether that's UTC-5 or UTC-4), and I guess everyone else is about the same. But since DST moves differently for many places, I didn't want to be too presumptuous by scootching the entries around like that. /me hates DST and wishes it could just evaporate, or that we would base all time on British standard/summer time instead. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PaulWFrields irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
