On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 13:23 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 10:38 -0600, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote: > > Meeting times have been discussed in IRC and on the list. > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BobJensen/MeetingTimes shows the results > > of our survey to find a time that will work for us all. > > > > -- > > Robert 'Bob' Jensen * * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BobJensen > > gpg fingerprint: F9F4 7243 4243 0043 2C45 97AF E8A4 C3AE 42EB 0BC6 > > Fedora Docs Projects FDSCo http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject > > Right, looks like: > > Weekend - tomorrow (Sun) at either 1600 UTC (1100 EST/0800 PST) or 1700 > UTC (1200 EST/0900 PST) And in fact, that is when we are meeting tomorrow. :) > Weekday - Mon/Tue/Wed at 1800 UTC (1300 EST/1000 PST) or 1900 UTC (1400 > EST/1100 PST) I note that we have around 4 to 6 weeks until Bob is unavailable on weekends. So, we could use the weekend meeting time for a month and then add a weekday meeting time when we need to. One reason to do this is >1 of us are likely to have a scheduling change in that time that makes it necessary. > Either we pick one and disenfranchise someone, or go with two. I would > say if we do the latter, do Sunday and Wednesday to keep momentum up. Alternating weeks? Also, any reason to choose Wednesday over Tuesday? We have a historic Tuesday alignment and there are 4 common open hours on Tue. v. 2 common on Wed. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
