On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 09:48 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > I am a bit dismayed at the fact that there seem to be gazillions of ways > to produce PDFs, but no one has invested time in getting DocBook to use > them. Apparently "laziness" trumps "hubris" in this case.¹ I'd bet > this project warrants a GSoC pitch, since it would benefit pretty much > the entire FOSS community and not just Fedora. +1 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraBounties#DocBook2PDF I've received two contacts regarding our man page bounty on there for GSoC and similar SoC projects. Seems like a good idea to put our request out front. /me files separate thought on getting some early exposure value by hyping Fedora GSoC-worthy projects *immediately* -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
