On 3/1/07, Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Here is the one I built this morning using htmldoc, as per Dimitris
suggestion:
http://people.redhat.com/kwade/fedora/fedora-install-guide-en_US.pdf
I'd like to compare the quality of the two. I put up the no-chunks HTML
that I used, in case you don't have a build environment handy. :)
http://people.redhat.com/kwade/fedora/fedora-install-guide-en_US.html
I uploaded a quick PDF I created with no attempt to beautify it. I took
your no-chunks HTML and just printed it using cups-PDF. I didn't see
any graphics in your web page, except for admonitions icons, so you
won't see any in the doc.
The links for the PDF files are:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JohnBabich?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=FC6UG.pdf
Another example is the Desktop User Guide, complete with screenshots, at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JohnBabich?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=DUG.pdf
This was produced from this link:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/DesktopUserGuide/Print
using File > Print (using printer CUPS/cups-PDF).
The output is even cleaner if you select
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/DesktopUserGuide/Print?action=print
which is the same as "Print View" under "More Actions" on the wiki page.
Let me know what you think of these samples.
John Babich
Volunteer, Fedora Docs Project
--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
