On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 10:57 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Igor Miletic wrote: > > >> I would stick with pup/pirut for now. That satisfies 90% of users' > >> needs. The extra features of yumex are really only interesting or > >> useful to a pool of people who already have expertise. As an example, > >> I've been using RPM packages for almost ten years and I rarely need to > >> use anything besides pup, pirut, or the occasional yum CLI myself. > >> > > > > Ok, then it is just pup and pirut too add. I think yum is covered well. > > For Pup, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/pup. You need to import and > rework that content into the guide. OPL++ and CLA++ Because of those, you can do as Rahul suggests, pull content from anywhere on fedoraproject.org. In some cases, coordinate with the maintainer of that page; you may be able to offer wordsmith fixes back and have that person be the canonical maintainer for the content in both locations (one drawing from the other). We'll have to look into ways to handle that. In the Wiki, one way is to have the child locations be [[Include(PageName)]] macros. The you literally maintain one location with multiple output locations on the Wiki. In this case, Igor, I think you are safe retiring the wiki/pup page and moving the content over permanently. You can leave a #REDIRECT NewPage/Name in the old page (just that in the body of the page makes it redirect to the new page). - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
