On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 06:22 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 17:57 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > Not sure how we want to treat this... The Release Notes are explicitly > > about Fedora Core, and not Extras. > > Perhaps we want to rethink that. Since we tout that "with Yum in > Anaconda, it is all the same now," we might have to treat the relnotes > the same way. I know that, by being on the system and all that, there > is an implicit connection between relnotes and installed system, but > with the lines blurring in the installation side, we need to consider > how to deal with it on the notes side. Good point, that. > One advantage of actually have the Docs/Beats/Extras section is that any > number of new pages could be added in that namespace. We then get a > bunch of organized, useful, Extras release notes. > > Personally, I'm curious to see where this takes us. I was surprised at > the attention of Extras in the notes, and am curious what would happen > if we encourage Extras maintainers to use The Release Notes as their > release notes, too. I'm happy to be overruled. So for now -- assuming we don't get a huge amount of material in -- we leave as is. If we get a big influx of material we can refactor it into subpages. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board Fedora Docs Project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
