On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 17:57 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > Not sure how we want to treat this... The Release Notes are explicitly > about Fedora Core, and not Extras. Perhaps we want to rethink that. Since we tout that "with Yum in Anaconda, it is all the same now," we might have to treat the relnotes the same way. I know that, by being on the system and all that, there is an implicit connection between relnotes and installed system, but with the lines blurring in the installation side, we need to consider how to deal with it on the notes side. One advantage of actually have the Docs/Beats/Extras section is that any number of new pages could be added in that namespace. We then get a bunch of organized, useful, Extras release notes. Personally, I'm curious to see where this takes us. I was surprised at the attention of Extras in the notes, and am curious what would happen if we encourage Extras maintainers to use The Release Notes as their release notes, too. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
