On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 08:46 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > If we want separate PO, a separate module would be preferable. We can > have fedora-release-notes Requires: fedora-faq if we want to package it > separately. If we want to just package them together, one PO only is > probably the name of the game. We just decided in the FDSCo meeting to do the FAQ as a separate package. Doing this, we can release updates, so even if the on-disk version is a few months out of date, it suggests you immediately update itself. :) - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
