On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 19:11 +0100, Dimitris Glezos wrote: > O/H Karsten Wade έγραψε: > > I think the idea of including it in fedora-release-note would be as a > > separate HTML file, *not* as part of the release note HTML itself. > > Sorry Karsten, didn't realize that you meant "directly into the release > notes" *package*. Yes, sorry, this package is new. We have had a CVS repository for a while, but the output ended up in the fedora-release package. We (meaning Paul W. Frield with the support of Jesse Keating) have created a new fedora-release-notes package. This means we can issue updates for content and translation. This was harder to do with the fedora-release package. > I believe translators will prefer the two docs (relnotes and faq) to > have different PO files and not one. We'll just have to hack the Makefile a bit for that, right? If you can, take a look at what that would take. I just checked in a current dump to DocBook of the FAQ, release-notes/devel/en_US/FAQ.xml. Can you get a stand-alone FAQ.po out of that? If so, then we'll look at treating the FAQ like we do the Docs/Beats and RELEASE-NOTES.po -- freezing, converting to XML, and including in i18n.r.c for everyone to translate. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
