On Wednesday 05 July 2006 14:55, Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 22:51 -0500, Patrick W. Barnes wrote: > > I don't see any reason we couldn't use UTF-8 for the HTML documents, and > > I would support making that change. > > IIRC, the issue we had in the past was that we were building UTF-8 but > httpd on fedora.redhat.com was serving it as the (default) ISO-8859-1. > This caused "funny characters" to appear only on pages built from our > DocBook outputted HTML wrapped with the PHP includes. > > Is this not the case now? Or am I totally on the wrong path? > If we can't provide UTF-8, I'd call that a bug. If we decide to push UTF-8, then the Infrastructure team can make sure that the websites can support it. We can try switching to UTF-8 and take any issues that arise to Infrastructure for correction. -- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64@xxxxxxxxx http://www.n-man.com/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/nman64 Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance! http://rate.affero.net/nman64/ --
Attachment:
pgpyjKoewqrvJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
