On Sunday 02 July 2006 17:13, "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 15:55 +0100, Dimitris Glezos wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I noticed that the html docs do not use a UTF-8 encoding. Searching the > > archive of this list I found this "problem" noticed in the past but I > > didn't find any post saying why we haven't changed it yet. > > > > Would this be too hard to fix without affecting other ascii-encoded > > *redhat.com pages? Or should we wait for the plone site? > > Hm, good point Dimitris... I wonder whether we should have "xhtml" > targets in Makefile.common. My understanding is the impact of XHTML is > minimal to non-existent for browsing clients, but I may be (as usual) > half (or less) informed. Anyone care to offer a wiser opinion? XHTML is currently an issue with rather passionate supporters on both sides. I'm generally a supporter of XHTML, but many of the opposing viewpoints are valid concerns. Since there aren't any issues with using HTML 4.01, I would recommend sticking with it on fedora.redhat.com for now. I don't see any reason we couldn't use UTF-8 for the HTML documents, and I would support making that change. -- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64@xxxxxxxxx http://www.n-man.com/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/nman64 Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance! http://rate.affero.net/nman64/ --
Attachment:
pgpFLWe4ai6Yi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
