Sorry to reply to myself, but in all my editorial blustering and buffoonery, I not only mixed up my footnote ordering while revising my reply, but failed to actually include the footnote URLs at all. :-( (Something tells me a better email composer would help here.) Here they are, with the antecedents included: > 1. The document is licensed as CC BY-NC-SA, so you would need to > relicense it as OPL 1.0 [2] for the Fedora Documentation Project to use > it. [2] http://opencontent.org/openpub/ > 2. The document would benefit from style editing. If you are > interested in improving the readability of your document, check a good > style manual, or even a simple Linux community one like the GNOME > Documentation Style Guidelines [1]. If you join the FDP and relicense > the doc for use here, I would be happy to work with you on this. [1] http://developer.gnome.org/documents/style-guide/index.html -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project Board: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
