On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 13:12 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 17:16 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > There isnt any content relevant enough to do a errata. Let's move on and > > work on the FC6 test1 and above release notes. > > I also don't think there is a need to completely stop updating the Wiki > for FC5, just make that the only place that is updated. > > How about this: > > 1. Move content from Docs/Beats/.* to Docs/Beats/FC5/.* (or similar > namespace) > > 2. Continue work on D/B/FC5, as needed. > > 3. Link to D/B/FC5 from Web-only release notes as an absolute latest > place you can still get new content from. > > 4. Begin work on FC6t1 notes in D/B. > > For example, Rahul posted a quick update about something today. I think > beat writers _should_ continue to do that. Eventually, this gives > Legacy a more living document to inherit. > > - Karsten > -- > > fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list Well for this to happen and not be an overwhelming pain in the rear there needs to be a few things. 1. Updates and at this point there have not been any so why keep the FC5 stuff around? 2. Automation of most of the processes. <Warning Opinion Follows> The release has now come and gone. We are holding on to the past. We can and should move on, the added work for the minimal benefit to the end-users in this case does not balance in my book. -- Robert 'Bob' Jensen http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BobJensen Fedora Documentation Projects Release Notes Editor-in-Chief
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
