On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 19:15 -0500, Patrick W. Barnes wrote: > It worked well. To avoid the warning, one simply needs to grab the public key > from pgp.mit.edu, which is the expected behavior. :-) I guess I'm hoping for something easier than that. I wish the GPG support was smoother in all cases. I really dig Evolution's signing and encryption, but they all require a separate downloading of the public key. Lazy factor. Missed opportunity at the last FUDCon for a keysigning. Why don't we care about those anymore? Don't we need a strong web of trust for Fedora keys to mean anything themselves? Is there any way we can do keysigning parties not in person? For example ... Okay, I started to write out a process that included pictures of ourselves signed and encrypted and verified ... and it was crazier than ever. Anyone want to start a Fedora Keys SIG that works to get _everyone_ to pause for a keysigning wherever two Fedorans meet in the meat? - Karsten, aka AD0E0C41 -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Editor * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Fedora Documentation Project http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject Learn. Network. Experience open source. Red Hat Summit Nashville | May 30 - June 2, 2006 Learn more: http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
