On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 10:33 +0100, Stuart Ellis wrote: > On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 18:48 -1000, Edward Haddock wrote: > > Aloha, > > I agree that signing emails is a good idea. In the doc I am writing > > I have kept it in and am using the instructions on how to set it up from > > the website. > > OK, thanks. I don't think it would be reasonable for it to be mandatory, > but it's a good thing to do. > > As mentioned on the previous mail, I've done instructions for > Thunderbird configuration. The Seahorse utility provides a graphical GPG > tool that integrates with GNOME, if you'd like to offer an alternative > to the command-line for users of that desktop. I have Seahorse installed too, and it's very convenient, especially with the Nautilus context menu "Encrypt/Decrypt File" functions it provides. > BTW, it's common e-mail etiquette to post replies after the quoted mail, > and some people in UNIX circles can be quite sharp about "top-posting", > so watch out :). We try not to slap any wrists around here, but sooner or later *someone* was bound to say something. :-) As you know, this is the "kindler, gentler Fedora sub-project." -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
