On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 09:55 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: > What would be nice, and I have no idea if it is feasible, is to have a > route to just-Wiki that is almost like a click-through CLA. But is that > advisable? Enforceable? How do you prove that the person who agreed to > the CLA is anyone in particular? It could have been a friend, "Just > click through this, you need that to get the EditGroup permissions." I think you may have answered your own question here. If you want an agreement to be legally binding and enforceable, you have to be able to prove that both parties entered into it. > Click-throughs are passive, people can do them without thought. The > sign-the-CLA-with-GPG is active. But I agree that GPG signing emails is just frills compared with the CLA. No reason people should go through that pain if they don't care. I've been using PGP/GPG so long that I don't, but it's obviously a significant barrier to some people, and since it's not necessary outside the CLA, we should remove or demote it like you said. My ~$0.02. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
