On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 17:00 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 20:57 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > > Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > > > > People are inevitably going to want local entities in their document. > > > > Hmm.. translatable local entities. I guess it's a natural > > progression. I'll look into adding XML->ENT productions into > > "Makefile.common" next month, er, tomorrow, 2006-03-01. > > I think I have the beginnings of this underway (q.v. "cvs diff -r1.80 > -r1.81 Makefile.common"). I think we should handle all our entity and > document snippet generation the same way we handle our docs, i.e. > subdirectories for PRI_LANG and PO. Or is this overkill? Our entities > and snippets have changed enough over time in the last couple of years > that I think the ROI is worth it. What do you think? Doesn't matter what Tommy might have written here, it couldn't say "YUCK" enough times. We are talking about this on IRC and he has shown me the magnitude of my error. Hold on while we adjust your set... *crackle crackle fizz* -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
