On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 13:23 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: > On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 15:26 -0800, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 16:48 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > > > Hello, All! > > > > > > Currently, the RPM packaging is geared to produce two types of RPM: > > > > > > 1) A .src.rpm whose content is somewhat similar to a CVS checkout; and > > > > > > 2) A .noarch.rpm whose content is targeted to the GNOME/KDE help > > > infrastructure. > > > > > > Should we also include the rendered HTML files in the .noarch.rpm or > > > should we have an additional version? > > > > What's the use case for additional rendered HTML files? > > Local URIs to use via file:/// in Firefox. Maybe linked from the > relnotes. It may also be useful for headless servers - the httpd-manual package might be a useful model for this. > I'd like to see there be a sort of envar $FEDORA_NEAREST_DOCS_URI that > can be set for a user so that Firefox goes to this URI for > documentation. That lets people get content locally when offline or > behind a restrictive firewall. > > Or am I just weird? No - that sounds like a nice touch. Perhaps just $NEAREST_DOCS_URI, so that it's obvious that site admins can use it to specify custom document sites. -- Stuart Ellis stuart@xxxxxxxx Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/ GPG key ID: 7098ABEA GPG key fingerprint: 68B0 E291 FB19 C845 E60E 9569 292E E365 7098 ABEA
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
