On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 16:48 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > Hello, All! > > Currently, the RPM packaging is geared to produce two types of RPM: > > 1) A .src.rpm whose content is somewhat similar to a CVS checkout; and > > 2) A .noarch.rpm whose content is targeted to the GNOME/KDE help > infrastructure. > > Should we also include the rendered HTML files in the .noarch.rpm or > should we have an additional version? What's the use case for additional rendered HTML files? -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
