Re: Adding rendered HTML to RPM packaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus:

> > Should we also include the rendered HTML files in the .noarch.rpm or
> > should we have an additional version?
> What's the use case for additional rendered HTML files?

"Seems A Shame To Waste Them"(tm)

Cheers

Attachment: pgpipfAtnG681.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 

fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux