On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 12:53 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: > On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 14:16 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > > I had suggested this to Scott also in IRC. I think the process might > > work better (and be less exhausting for Scott!) if we use the Wiki page > > as a place simply to outline and make terse notes. Then Stuart and I > > can do the actual "longhand" writing in CVS, and Scott can view the > > results at the webtest host to monitor and critique our progress. This > > also keeps Scott from having to learn much about our style guidelines > > and cuts down on our workload too, since it's easier (I think) for us to > > write straight into CVS rather than convert -> merge (yuck) -> edit for > > style. Just my thoughts, waiting for others to comment... > > +1 > > Whatever works for you three, but that seems elegant to me. > > 14 January is the freeze date for content that relates to FC5 test2. If > you want to do a coincidental test release of the Installation Guide, we > can surely get a link in the test2 announcement. > > - Karsten > -- > > fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list Lets shoot for FC5 test3, I need to learn how to edit in XML and get the data I have already put into the correct format. Also I will need some more time to run through the other installation methods with rawhide and capture the remaining screen shots that I do not currently have. Based on that I do not believe it is currently feasible to have a working document by 14 January so test3 would be much more realistic. -- Scott Glaser Fedora Core User Web - http://fedoraunity.org/ Key fingerprint = 61F5 C7DF 2F63 4A53 44D2 B9BE 3841 EA4F 5990 00BD
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
