On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 14:16 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > I had suggested this to Scott also in IRC. I think the process might > work better (and be less exhausting for Scott!) if we use the Wiki page > as a place simply to outline and make terse notes. Then Stuart and I > can do the actual "longhand" writing in CVS, and Scott can view the > results at the webtest host to monitor and critique our progress. This > also keeps Scott from having to learn much about our style guidelines > and cuts down on our workload too, since it's easier (I think) for us to > write straight into CVS rather than convert -> merge (yuck) -> edit for > style. Just my thoughts, waiting for others to comment... +1 Whatever works for you three, but that seems elegant to me. 14 January is the freeze date for content that relates to FC5 test2. If you want to do a coincidental test release of the Installation Guide, we can surely get a link in the test2 announcement. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Content Services Fedora Documentation Project http://www.redhat.com/docs http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
