On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 17:41 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> I have added the "figs/Manifest-${LANG}" file, mentioned in my
> previous email, so you can name your files using whatever convention
> you choose; the cost is having to explicity identify the files.
>
> Sound OK, now?
It should also be noted in the documentation-guide (or where ever these
rules land), that you need to include the directories in the Manifest as
well. My apologies if that was stated already.
Additionally, should the Manifest-${LANG} should reference images
relative to the figs/ directory? For example
$ cat figs/Manifest-en
ch-intro/one.png
ch-asdf/foo/bar.png
ch-qwerty/one.png
If that is the case then ../docs-common/bin/copy-figs is able to find
them, however for htmlchunked output it places those files in ...
${DOCBASE}-${LANG}/ch-intro/one.png
${DOCBASE}-${LANG}/ch-asdf/foo/bar.png
${DOCBASE}-${LANG}/ch-qwerty/one.png
Which now differs from how html-nochunks refers to these images:
figs/ch-intro/one.png
figs/ch-asdf/foo/bar.png
figs/ch-qwerty/one.png
For consistency, and working figures, I would suggest that copy-figs put
all figures under a figs/ directory within ${DOCBASE}-${LANG} (like
${DOCBASE}-${LANG}/figs)? Am I using the Manifest-${LANG} incorrectly?
Thanks,
James
--
==========================================
James Laska -- jlaska@xxxxxxxxxx
Quality Engineering -- Red Hat, Inc.
==========================================
--
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
