On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 21:53 +0000, Stuart Ellis wrote: > I think that different types of content require different arrangements, > and the same considerations probably apply whatever the technology (Wiki > or static pages). > > Pages with certain kinds of content need to be carefully maintained, and > may need more stringent change control than is usual. Material like: > > - Legal and policy statements > - Project admin, e.g. schedules > - Download pages (with URLs and checksums) > - "Shop-front" pages, like the front page and FAQ, intended to be seen > by the new and unwary > > For other stuff, it may be best to let people get on and produce > whatever they need. Having one person per category to act as a > maintainer, moderator and point of contact is probably enough. This sounds like a reasonable compromise of control, applying more where it is needed, less where it gets in the way. > FWIW, I really like Patrick's idea of having of a mailing list for > official and third-party Website maintainers to get together. I have request fedora-websites-list and will announce it here when it is ready. A post to fedora-announce also seems in order. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
