On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 18:12 -0600, Patrick Barnes wrote: > For Docs, using ##writer and ##editor might also be of interest. ##technical-contact This is especially important for Beat pages. It might be more than a page needs, though. > Any thoughts? Is this how other, successful Wiki projects handle it? I was under the impression that it was normally more chaotic than that. My instinct is always to exert some control.[1] Thus, I don't trust my own thinking when it comes to managing the Wiki overall. That is why I have tried to limit the FDP control to just certain pages.[2] What Rahul and Patrick are proposing is that the FDP be the accountable party for all formal[3] Fedora websites. This is an addition to our existing mission, or perhaps just an extension. I agree with it 100%. - Karsten [1] This is the control-freak in me. One thing that FDP brings to me is a chance to not be so controlling and to delegate, so thanks to all for the constant chance at self-improvement. :) [2] Meaning: wiki/Docs/* wiki/DocsProject/* [3] I use formal because 'official' is a word loaded with meaning, yet means something different to all. 'Official' is an overused word for these contexts, IME. -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
