On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 09:07 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > Uttered Mark Johnson <mjohnson@xxxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > > Karsten Wade wrote: > > Here's Stuart's yum tutorial I built with FOP a few weeks ago: > > http://people.redhat.com/mjohnson/fedora/yum-software-management-en.pdf > > It has some urls, but I don't recall how the ulinks in the source were > > marked up... > > I have tested both <ulink> forms using HTML and FOP. Both forms > render correctly. So the choice is ours. > > I'd recommend using the null content form of > > <ulink url="http://www.example.com"/> > > because it is more prone to correct usage. I'm with you, Tommy. It's also easier to parse the XML source visually with this form while editing, not that this is a major concern. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
