On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 19:30 -0400, Mark Johnson wrote: > I'm actually neutral on this general argument/discussion, (despite my > above comments), but I would like to say that if someone (i.e. Thomas) > is willing to take this on, it might lessen the learning curve a bit for > new authors. (whoops. /me already said this) Almost no one wants the learning curve of DocBook XML anyway, which is why all the talk about Wiki has been dominating the list of late. Most people seem to do their drafts in HTML, and now that OO.o is a possibility, I suspect many people will make use of that as well. Those of us using Emacs (or vi) with XML facilities are probably a minority at this point, so this is probably all moot. I'd bet that using a subset is going to inconvenience as many people as it would help. This is not to say the idea has no merit, more that the ship has sailed... -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
