On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 09:12 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > My biggest question here: > > Do we distinguish between "documentation for using Fedora" and > "documentation for helping to produce Fedora"? > > A lot of the stuff that is "documented" on the wiki is process for > contributors. "How do I get a package into Extras?" "How do I get an > account in the accounts system?" And so forth. These seem like living > documents to me. > > Do you have some good examples of wiki documents that you'd like to > formalize? I know a lot of our docs process is on the Wiki, and formalizing that stuff makes sense, since it's not often going to change. For subjects like the examples you (Greg) mention, I would think that trying to formalize that stuff would be like trying to herd cats. Just look at all the changes in the last six months alone! I doubt we need to insert ourselves into that particular work flow. Is there stuff on the development side of the house that's a little more static, and would be a good candidate for formalization? -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
