On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 12:21 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > > I figured a *developer* type would have more > > experience with mock and how it works, and thus be able to more quickly > > generate the required documentation. Can you help with this? > > Dunno, I'm buried in coding-for-dollars at the moment. Maybe Seth > could squirt me a copy of 0.4 that I could look at and render a final > answer. Or just letting me know how 0.4 differs from 0.3 might be enough. Anybody who's interested in helping can simply download it from the development repo. (Ah, the beauty of open development.) I don't want to put any further words in Seth's mouth, but if he doesn't have time to write the docs himself, he probably doesn't have time to do a lot of explaining either. ;-) If you don't have time, don't worry about it. When our units at work had to respond to all-hands canvassing, we had a phrase appended to most of them that said "Positive responses only." This is kind of like that. If anyone out there definitely has time to help, please pipe up. If not, no sweat. :-) -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
