On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 06:02 -0500, Thomas Jones wrote: > On Friday 29 July 2005 16:23, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > Isn't the color system and/or browser *dependent*? In other words, the > > links are colored exactly the way any generic link is colored for the > > end user, meaning they don't see anything they don't recognize. > > However, I'm not against changing them, as long as we (a) agree on what > > sticks out without sticking out TOO much, and (b) it is nicely > > Fedora-like. > > Oops...you are right. ;) The "generic" link is inherently capable of being > different on every node. Which brings to light the issue of fedora-like > representation to the end-user. > > I like what yourself and Karsten have done with the new scheme. I personally > would think that some colors that promote a fedora-like visual appearance > would be great. The accepted standard of blue/purple are a safe bet. But then > again another selection from you/Karsten may provide more cohesion with the > new scheme. I made another change to the heading color and link colors, this time to be more adherent to the official web site. I think you'll like the results! Please check the mockup at: http://docs.frields.org/mirror-tutorial-en/sn-planning-and-setup.html -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
