-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 29 July 2005 16:23, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > Isn't the color system and/or browser *dependent*? In other words, the > links are colored exactly the way any generic link is colored for the > end user, meaning they don't see anything they don't recognize. > However, I'm not against changing them, as long as we (a) agree on what > sticks out without sticking out TOO much, and (b) it is nicely > Fedora-like. Oops...you are right. ;) The "generic" link is inherently capable of being different on every node. Which brings to light the issue of fedora-like representation to the end-user. I like what yourself and Karsten have done with the new scheme. I personally would think that some colors that promote a fedora-like visual appearance would be great. The accepted standard of blue/purple are a safe bet. But then again another selection from you/Karsten may provide more cohesion with the new scheme. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC6gzJoR5cE1e/kEIRArbXAJ9dny/ScL+ixm9fAWB4UDRVzvdBIACgyxKl HyG3k6usCG2Jq9NhXneaO/4= =3VRY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
