On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 14:14 -0400, Elliot Lee wrote: > A lot of this discussion about organization is a bit pointless. Remember, > to the user browsing around, the pages are connected in a WEB, not a TREE, > so trying to figure out what directory structure to use is not worth a > discussion - someone needs to pick a directory structure and go with it. > > The issue that does deserve collective attention is making sure that each > page has appropriate links to build the right navigational structure for > users. The filesystem directory structure only affects the web structure > if you let it :-) D'oh! You know, I was thinking about that yesterday and forgot that it applied. :) Although, a nice directory structured does help in making sense to people. I'd do it with symlinks, if we could check those in. Having the underlying tree follow different conventions is confusing to maintainers and URL readers. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
