Re: [ANN] docs-common/Makefile.common

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 10:54 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:

> 
> By the way, the XSL has been fixed to embed the legalnotice in the
> nochunks version rather than creating an outboard file.  While someone
> shipping a document without images or CSS doesn't "break" the document
> per se, if it goes without the legalnotice intact, that could be
> considered an actual problem.

I'll have to get this into the example-tutorial (perhaps a no-chunks
version?), but the legalnotice appearing at the top of a no-chunks is
why I created all the weirdness around how the legalnotice is used.

legalnotice-en.xml calls in legalnotice-content-en.xml

If you use the standard legalnotice-en.xml and no-chunks, the entire
notice is displayed at the very top of the document above the table of
contents.

The alternative is to use (a version of?) legalnotice-relnotes-en.xml.
This file references an <appendix> that contains the full text, as is
common with source code and others -- you don't include a copy of the
GPL in the header of every file, you refer to LICENSE.

Then you make an <appendix> and use that to pull in legalnotice-content-
en.xml.


-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
                       Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 

fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux