Re: [ANN] docs-common/Makefile.common

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 10:43 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 09:32 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> > Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus:
> > 
> > > I made a few changes to the Makefile.common, and I think that should
> > > work now.  The example-tutorial/Makefile has been updated as well.
> > 
> > For "nochunks", where do the graphics and images go?
> 
> Whoops.  Well, originally I was thinking to myself, "Self, maybe you
> should just leave that stuff out since it makes for, uh, more than one
> file."  Then I thought better of it... now the images and CSS come into
> the current directory where they're expected.  I don't see a big value
> in a "nochunks-tarball," but if you disagree there's no reason we
> couldn't have that target.

By the way, the XSL has been fixed to embed the legalnotice in the
nochunks version rather than creating an outboard file.  While someone
shipping a document without images or CSS doesn't "break" the document
per se, if it goes without the legalnotice intact, that could be
considered an actual problem.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 

fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux