On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 10:43 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 09:32 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > > Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > > > > I made a few changes to the Makefile.common, and I think that should > > > work now. The example-tutorial/Makefile has been updated as well. > > > > For "nochunks", where do the graphics and images go? > > Whoops. Well, originally I was thinking to myself, "Self, maybe you > should just leave that stuff out since it makes for, uh, more than one > file." Then I thought better of it... now the images and CSS come into > the current directory where they're expected. I don't see a big value > in a "nochunks-tarball," but if you disagree there's no reason we > couldn't have that target. By the way, the XSL has been fixed to embed the legalnotice in the nochunks version rather than creating an outboard file. While someone shipping a document without images or CSS doesn't "break" the document per se, if it goes without the legalnotice intact, that could be considered an actual problem. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
