On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 13:00 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 12:49 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 11:56 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > > On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 10:10 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > > Here are the facts of licensing pertaining to xmlformat: > > > > > > > > (A) The original portions of xmlformat by Paul DuBois, paul at kitebird > > > > com, are licensed under a BSD-style license.[4] The BSD-style license > > > > is an open source license. The only portion of xmlformat not covered by > > > > this license is the implementation of the REX shallow parser. > > > > > > > > (B) The REX shallow parser, which is copyrighted by Robert D. Cameron, > > > > cameron at sfu ca, is licensed under terms shown below in their > > > > entirety: > > > > > > BSD and MIT are both FOSS licenses. > > > > If only the REX author had used one of those! :-) > > How many clauses did you omit in your original description of the REX > license? None. The licensing text is reproduced *in its entirety*, as I stated in my message. The license is attached to the implementations of REX written by the author of the paper from which they are drawn. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
