Re: xmlformat licensing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 11:56 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 10:10 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > Here are the facts of licensing pertaining to xmlformat:
> > 
> > (A) The original portions of xmlformat by Paul DuBois, paul at kitebird
> > com, are licensed under a BSD-style license.[4]  The BSD-style license
> > is an open source license.  The only portion of xmlformat not covered by
> > this license is the implementation of the REX shallow parser.
> > 
> > (B) The REX shallow parser, which is copyrighted by Robert D. Cameron,
> > cameron at sfu ca, is licensed under terms shown below in their
> > entirety:
> 
> BSD and MIT are both FOSS licenses.

If only the REX author had used one of those! :-)

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 

fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux