I was playing with the look and feel of callout sections a few weeks back. Not only don't we have the fedora-style images, but I noticed that if you are showing command blocks that have cut'n'paste style code, the callout numbers interfere with your cut'n'paste. I had a large enough code block that I wanted to use callout's to break it down and explain various parts ... it just killed the cut'n'pastability once added. Thoughts? P.S. I actually hadn't realized that docbook-style-dsssl provided stock callout images until I was about to launch this email: $ ls /usr/share/sgml/docbook/dsssl-stylesheets-*/images/callouts/ 1.gif 10.gif 2.gif 3.gif 4.gif 5.gif 6.gif 7.gif 8.gif 9.gif Thanks, James Laska On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 11:46 -0500, Thomas Jones wrote: > Thomas Jones wrote: > > > I've attempted to determine some information about the callout images > > used in fedora's documentation --- to no avail. > > > > So I bow to the mercy of the mailinglist and ask for help. What is the > > standardized styling and location of the callout images? I have built > > custom callouts for current development of my xml sources; but didn't > > want to stray from standard practice. > > > > Also I came across a peculiar problem declaring the xsl parameter > > using xmlto. For some reason due to the java implemented processor, I > > am getting a ColumnWidth error. The only alteration performed was to > > include an extension stylesheet for the declaration of a new image > > path. :-( > > > > Admittedly, I have never used xmlto and prefer xsltproc. However it > > might be a moot point if the standard path is acceptable. > > > > Thanks, > > Thomas > > > Bump. > -- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
