Karsten Wade wrote: > >dbgenent? > >Otherwise, yeah, I've seen the *.ent designation before, that makes >sense. > > > dbgenent refers to the docbook general entity module. normally --- dbgenent.mod. But, the reason for the module extension is to modularize all entities from within one file. And specific entities are then subjected to categorization. i.e. iso-amsa.ent, iso-amsb.ent, etc... In all the higher-level drivers i've utilized before, the custom general entities were called from a module file: example.dbgenent.mod. Then this inclusion file calls the neccessary entity declarations: category-project.ent using a parameter entity declaration. But this complexity is not found in fedora declarations. Is just *.ent good? >>- if the "bluecurve" entity is accepted; does the <interfacedefinition/> >>element suffice as the parent node with its expected context? >> >> > >I don't see that element, do you mean <interfacename>? Regardless, AIUI >that is an interface for OO programming and not a user interface. I >would capitalize "Bluecurve" and leave it alone without a special tag, >after all, it's just a name. > > > OK ... sounds good. >>- if the "rpm" entity is accepted; what is its legal status? registered >>or trademark? >> >> > >Not sure, but I think it's irrelevant. > >My understanding is that we may replace most of the legal trademark >boilerplate with a line like this: > >"All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners." > >I'll hunt up a better sentence than that one. > >I had this confirmed from Red Hat legal last year. > >After you have properly attributed a trademark in the boilerplate, you >can use the mark in the text without a (TM) or (R). However, you -must- >use the term properly, e.g.: > >Red Hat -not- RedHat >FireWire -not- firewire >RPM -not- rpm >etc. > >This is a best effort thing, anyone who finds an improper spelling of a >trademark should just file a bug report. :) > > > > I didn't realize fedora-docs had encompassing permissions. My bad. Guess I should have done more research. Better to be safe than sorry! :) > > >>- i neglected to utilize the common ISO entity declarations for >>readability. New authors find it difficult to read if utilized; yet >>translators probably need the ISO declarations. I prefer ISO --- but >>then again i am weird. ;) >> >> > >How about we do this in two passes? Get all the details worked out, >then consider ISO entity declarations. > >- Karsten > > Good idea. -- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
